Statement of appliance of corporate governance policies and the combined code
The directors believe as a Board that their principal function is to
deliver sustainable wealth to the Group’s shareholders, and that this
should be delivered within a framework of robust corporate governance
compliance. The Board has continued to ensure that the Group applies and
maintains the principles of good corporate governance, in so far as is
practicable and appropriate for a public company of its size.
The application of corporate governance procedures within the Group and
the extent of compliance with the Listing Rules of the UK Listing
Authority (12.43A) relating to the provisions of the Principles of Good
Governance and Code of Best Practice (the ‘Combined Code 2006’) is
summarised below;
Extracted from the 2008 Annual Report & Accounts
A Directors
A. 1 The Board
The Board currently comprises a non-executive chairman, two executive
directors and three non-executive directors.
-
1.1 The Board directors provide the Group with experience and
knowledge from a range of industry, financial and commercial
backgrounds. This combination of skills and experience assists the
Board in any decision making process and in the development of
business strategy, allowing all directors to make a significant and
individual contribution. Biographical details of each director,
including current directorships held in other non-Group companies, are
detailed under Directors and advisers on page 34.
The Group
maintains a schedule of matters reserved for decision by the Board,
including the release of a number of corporate and statutory
disclosures, approval of major operating strategies and acquisitions,
composition of relevant Committees and management structures, and
matters relating to ethical, health and safety concerns.
The
directors provide effective leadership and control of the Group by
means of regular Board meetings throughout the year. Relevant papers
are circulated to all members of the Board on a timely basis and in
advance of each meeting, and the quantity and focus of such
information is reviewed on an ongoing basis. Directors provide
feedback to management to enable the reporting formats and content of
Board papers to be enhanced, and make individual enquiries of
management for clarification on issues whenever necessary.
The
Group appoints key executive positions throughout the business to
provide strong local management teams. These management teams aim to
improve financial performance and develop and implement operational
improvements within their businesses. The management teams report
directly to executive Board directors through the Group Executive
Committee, which meets on a regular basis to discuss key operational
issues and monitor business unit performance. This structure supports
a devolved process of decision-making for day-to-day operations, and
allows the Group Board to focus resources more efficiently within the
Group.
-
1.2 The roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are separated,
with John Gordon holding the office of Chairman and Kevin Appleton the
position of Chief Executive Officer. John Gordon will retire from the
Board at the Company’s Annual General Meeting, to be held on 23 April
2009, and will be succeeded by David Hollywood who was previously the
Group’s Audit Committee Chairman and a non-executive director. A
search for a replacement for David Hollywood as Chairman of the Audit
Committee and as a non-executive director will be commenced during
2009.
John Standen is the Group’s Senior Independent
Director.During 2008, the Board held 10 formal meetings. The
attendance of each director at these meetings is shown in the table
below:
| Director | K A Appleton | J E Gordon | D J Hollywood | A S Merrell | T S Ross | J F Standen |
|---|
| Attended in person | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
|---|
| Apologies given | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|---|
-
1.3 The Chairman holds separate meetings, at least annually, with the
non-executive directors in order to review the contributions and
performance of all individuals comprising the Board. Further details
of this process are given in A.6.1 below.
-
1.4 Minutes of Board meetings are agreed by all directors, ensuring
that an accurate record is made of all relevant matters.
-
1.5 The Company reviews conduct and liability issues as part of its
annual risk review and mitigates these exposures wherever possible.
A. 2 Segregation of duties
-
2.1 The Board has a Non Executive Chairman and a Chief Executive
Officer enabling separation of shareholder interests from the
day-to-day operational requirements of the business. Each has clear
lines of responsibility and reporting which have been agreed by the
Board.
A. 3 Board balance and independence
-
3.1 The three non-executive directors constitute in excess of one
third of the total Board members. The non-executive directors provide
a strong and independent monitor on the performance of both the Group
and its executive management.
-
3.2 The Board believes that the non-executive directors are
independent within the guidance of the Combined Code 2006 as they have
no conflicting business interests with the Group, they are remunerated
on a fixed fee basis only and have adequate and unfettered access to
internal management and external professional advisors to the Group.
Their backgrounds in industry and finance make them suitably qualified
to perform their duties as members of the Board and as members of the
Audit, and Remuneration and Nomination Committees.
-
3.3 Major shareholders in the Company are offered the opportunity to
meet annually with the Senior Non-Executive Director, to allow any
concerns to be raised independently from the Board. In addition, the
non-executive directors ensure that they are available for questions
from individual shareholders on the day of the Annual General Meeting.
A. 4 Appointments to the Board
-
4.1 The Remuneration and Nomination Committees comprise the three
non-executive directors and have the responsibility for nominating and
appointing new directors, together with the determination of the
remuneration packages of the executive directors. The Committees have
written terms of reference, which are published on the Group’s website
(www.lavendongroup.com).
Tim Ross is Chairman of both the Remuneration and Nomination
Committees, and all Committee members are considered to be independent.
During
2008, the Remuneration and Nomination Committees held 5 formal
meetings. The attendance of each director at these meetings is shown
in the table below:
| Director | D J Hollywood | T S Ross | J F Standen |
|---|
| Attended in person | 5 | 5 | 5 |
|---|
| Apologies given | - | - | - |
|---|
-
4.2 Non-executive directors hold appointments for a term period of
three years, and their fees are determined by the Board following
external benchmarking. The reappointment of non-executive directors is
addressed after giving due consideration to their qualifications,
continuing independence, performance and willingness to accept
reappointment.
-
4.3 The Chairman currently holds no other roles which are considered
to impair or conflict with his ability to fulfil his duties to the
Company.
-
4.4 The terms and conditions of appointment of the non-executive
directors are available for inspection at the Company’s registered
office and during the Annual General Meeting each year.
-
4.5 The work of the Remuneration Committee is detailed in a separate
Remuneration Report on pages 22 to 26 of the financial statements.
A. 5 Information and professional development
-
5.1 The Group allows directors to take professional and independent
advice as may be necessary in carrying out their duties. Directors
also attend training courses, when appropriate, to ensure they remain
up to date with the latest developments and legal requirements which
impact their individual responsibilities.
-
5.2 The joint role of Finance Director and Company Secretary, held by
Alan Merrell, ensures that the directors have ready access to the
Company Secretary in all relevant matters and that compliance with
Board procedures is maintained.
A. 6 Performance evaluation
-
6.1 The Board undertakes an annual review of its performance. The
directors complete detailed appraisals on matters relevant to the
Board, its Committees and director performance, from which action
plans are developed, where necessary, to address areas identified for
improvement.
A. 7 Re-election
-
7.1 In accordance with the Articles of the Company a maximum of one
third of the directors offer themselves for re-election each year at
the Company’s Annual General Meeting, provided that each director
shall stand for re-election within three years of the date of their
previous re-election. This year Alan Merrell, Tim Ross and John
Standen will seek re-election and their biographical details and the
Annual General Meeting particulars are detailed on page 34 and pages
87 to 92 of the financial statements respectively.
B Remuneration
The Remuneration Committee considers they are currently complying in
full with the relevant provisions of the Combined Code 2006 and outline
their procedures and guidelines in a separate Remuneration Report on
pages 22 to 26 of the financial statements. Details of the directors’
remuneration and interests in shares during 2008 are included within the
Remuneration Report. The Committees annually invite shareholders to vote
on the Remuneration Report at the Company’s Annual General Meeting.
C Accountability and audit
C. 1 Financial reporting
-
1.1 The directors and auditors set out their respective
responsibilities for preparing and reviewing the financial statements
in the Statement of directors’ responsibilities on page 33 and in the
Independent auditors’ report on pages 42 to 43 of the financial
statements
C. 2 Internal control
-
2.1 The Board maintains a system of internal controls within the Group
to provide them with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance of the
reliability of the financial information used both within the business
and for external publication, as well as safeguarding the assets of
the Group against unauthorised use or disposition.
Although no
system of internal controls can provide absolute assurance against
material misstatement, loss or mismanagement of the Group’s assets,
the systems in place are designed to identify to the Board matters
which require attention on a timely basis so that they may be
considered and dealt with appropriately.
The Board has reviewed
the effectiveness of the systems of internal control that were in
operation during the past financial year, and these are summarised
under the following headings:
Control environment
There
is a clearly defined organisational structure that allows the Group’s
objectives to be planned, communicated, executed, controlled and
monitored. The Group employs suitably qualified staff so that the
appropriate level of authority can be delegated to ensure the
efficient management of the business. In the UK all relevant employees
hold industry accredited certification and licences.
Identification
and evaluation of business risks and control objectives
The
identification and evaluation of both financial and non financial
business risks facing the Group is reviewed annually by the Board as
part of the approval of the annual operating budget for the
forthcoming year. During this process the effectiveness of its
internal controls in safeguarding against these risks is considered,
and where necessary additional controls are introduced or existing
controls are enhanced.
Information systems
The
management information systems provide the Group with relevant and
timely reports from which both the Board and senior management can
monitor the performance of the business. Budgets and prior year data
provide the Board and senior management with comparative information
with which to assess and monitor the performance of the various
activities of the Group. Operational performance statistics are
reviewed against a range of measures including competitive benchmarks
and historical trends. The Group has continued to invest in developing
and enhancing these information systems during the year, to ensure
that the information is provided in the most efficient manner.
Main
control procedures
Defined controls and procedures are embedded
throughout the organisation, and cover the preparation and review of
financial and operational information, the setting of appropriate
authority levels, the segregation of duties and the defining of
procedures for seeking and obtaining approval for major transactions
and organisational changes.
Monitoring
The executive
directors have significant involvement in the day-to-day management of
the Group’s activities and are, therefore, able to monitor the control
procedures at an operational and financial level. A Group Executive
Committee, comprising the two executive directors and direct reports
from the operating subsidiaries and business functional units within
the Group, meets regularly to ensure the efficient communication and
control of information and processes.
During 2008, the Group
introduced an internal audit function, which is undertaking a
programme of financial audits across the Group. The internal audit
reports are addressed to, and reviewed by, the Audit Committee, and
appropriate actions, if required, agreed. In addition, the Group’s
operations are subject to regular Quality and Health & Safety audits.
Any
reportable control weaknesses identified by the Group’s external
auditors are discussed with the Audit Committee, and reports
circulated to the relevant executive directors.
C. 3 Audit Committee and Auditors
-
3.1 The Audit Committee comprises the three non-executive directors
and is responsible for the appointment of auditors, setting policy for
the procurement of non-audit services and internal monitoring and
reporting procedures. The Committee has written terms of reference,
which are published on the Group’s website (www.lavendongroup.com).
David Hollywood is the Chairman of the Audit Committee.
During
2008 the Audit Committee held 3 formal meetings. The attendance of
each director at these meetings (and the occasions at which the
Group’s external auditors were invited to attend) is shown in the
table below:
| Director | D J Hollywood | T S Ross | J F Standen | Group's external auditors |
|---|
| Attended in person | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
|---|
| Apologies given | - | - | - | - |
|---|
The Audit Committee
considers it is currently complying in full with the relevant
provisions of the Combined Code 2006 and outlines its responsibilities
and activities in a separate Report of the Audit Committee on page 41.
D Relations with shareholders
D. 1 Dialogue with institutional shareholders
-
1.1 The directors hold a series of meetings with institutional
investors following the publication of the Group’s annual and interim
financial results each year. Meetings are also held during the year
for both existing and prospective shareholders, to provide the
opportunity to understand the Group’s operations and strategy in
greater detail.
-
1.2 The Board retains a Stockbroker to ensure a regular flow of
relevant information is made available to both current and prospective
shareholders and to facilitate feedback to assist the Board in
understanding the issues and concerns of the shareholders.
D.2 The Annual General Meeting and shareholder communications
The majority of the Company’s share capital continues to be held by
institutional investors. Whilst the Company does not include a formal
Group presentation at the Annual General Meeting for smaller private
shareholders, the Company maintains a website: www.lavendongroup.com,
which publishes financial results, formal announcements, and a number of
corporate governance documents for review by current and potential
shareholders.
Analysis of shareholders at 31 December
| Number Of Shareholders | Number Of Shares Held |
|---|
| 2008 No. | 2007 No. | 2008 No. '000 | 2007 No. '000 |
|---|
| <5,000 | 788 | 785 | 961 | 876 |
|---|
| 5,001 to 50,000 | 168 | 142 | 2,944 | 2,356 |
|---|
| >50,000 | 88 | 83 | 42,327 | 40,757 |
|---|
| | 1,044 | 1,010 | 46,232 | 43,989 |
|---|
-
2.1 The directors announce the proxy vote on the respective
resolutions at the Annual General Meeting, after the show of hands for
each resolution. The overall voting for each resolution is publicly
announced following the completion of the Annual General Meeting.
-
2.2 It continues to be the Company’s policy to ensure that Annual
General Meeting resolution proposals remain segregated when voting
issues are substantially separate matters. In particular a separate
resolution relating to the annual report and accounts will continue to
be included. Details of the Annual General Meeting date, venue and the
agenda are disclosed on pages 87 and 92.
-
2.3 The Company believes that private shareholders gain a benefit from
having the full Board, including the Chairmen of the Audit, and
Remuneration and Nomination Committees, available at the Annual
General Meeting to answer individual questions or concerns about the
Group’s performance and strategy.
Statement of compliance with the combined code under listing rule
12.43A
In accordance with the guidance of the UK Listing Authority, the Board
has formally reviewed its internal control procedures as required by the
Combined Code 2006.
The directors believe that the Group is complying with all current areas
of best practice as detailed in the Combined Code 2006.